Embedded Files
Welcome to the Faith Studios Bible Answers Weekly Blog! Here you'll find biblical answers to common questions, with new articles added regularly.
How to find truth from the Bible
How to find truth from the Bible
You can generally find truth in the Bible in two ways:
It is plainly stated.
It is not plainly stated, but it is obviously implied.
A good example is Uzzah's death in 2 Samuel 6. Uzzah died after touching the ark while it was being transported on an ox cart (2 Samuel 6:3–7).
A short time later, the ark was carried by the Levites on their shoulders, exactly as God had commanded (1 Chronicles 15:13–15; Numbers 7:9).
The Bible never explicitly says, "David read the Law, realized their mistake, and repented." But what else explains the sudden change? The obvious implication is that they discovered God's instructions, corrected their error, and God blessed their obedience. Sometimes the Bible teaches truth not by stating every detail outright, but by making the conclusion unmistakable.
Enjoyed this answer?
Did God warn Adam & Eve about Satan?
Did God warn Adam & Eve about Satan?
The Bible says that if an ox was known to gore people and its owner failed to restrain it or warn others, the owner was held responsible (Exodus 21:28–29).
That reveals an important principle: God values warning people about known danger.
So if we apply that principle, it makes little sense that God would place Adam and Eve in the garden without warning them about Satan's rebellion.
The principle strongly implies that God would have warned them, just as a responsible owner would warn others about a known danger.
Enjoyed this answer?
Was Adam with Eve at the tree?
Was Adam with Eve at the tree?
There are two main views on Adam being "with" Eve (Genesis 3:6). 💯
Some believe Adam was standing right beside her the whole time, silently watching. But that seems difficult to reconcile with the fact that he had been given dominion over the animals (Genesis 1:26–28).
Others point out that "with" doesn't always mean right beside. For example, Simeon was said to remain "with" Joseph (Genesis 42:24), yet he was actually confined in prison.
The word can simply mean in the same general place, not shoulder-to-shoulder.
Enjoyed this answer?
Did God give Lucifer a chance to repent?
Did God give Lucifer a chance to repent?
Isaiah 14:12 says, "How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!"
Notice the imagery: Lucifer is compared to a tree that has been cut down (Isaiah 14:8, 12).
Throughout Scripture, God gives trees every opportunity before they are removed.
Jesus spoke of a tree being given more time to bear fruit (Luke 13:6–9), and John the Baptist said the axe is laid to the root only after the tree has remained fruitless (Matthew 3:10).
The implication is clear: God doesn't destroy first and ask questions later.
He gives opportunity to repent. Lucifer would have received that same mercy—but pride kept him from turning back. 🙏🏼
Enjoyed this answer?
Was Jesus called "Jesus" in heaven?
Was Jesus called "Jesus" in heaven?
Calling Jesus "Jesus" before His incarnation is an example of prolepsis—using a later-known name earlier for clarity.
The Bible does this too. For example, Stephen refers to Abram as Abraham even when speaking about events that happened before God changed his name (Acts 7:2–4).
It's simply a clear way of identifying the same person.
Enjoyed this answer?
Were Adam & really naked in the Garden?
Were Adam & really naked in the Garden?
There are two main views on Adam and Eve's clothing.
One says they were completely uncovered.
The other points out that they were made in God's image, and Psalm 104:2 says God "covers Himself with light as with a garment." If so, Adam and Eve may have been clothed in light as well.
In that view, they were "naked" only in the sense that they wore no fabric. They were still covered with a garment of light—a covering they lost after sin entered the world.
Enjoyed this answer?
Is Michael the archangel really Jesus?
Is Michael the archangel really Jesus?
There are two main views on this topic.
One says Michael is a literal angel who leads heaven's army.
The other says Michael is a title for Christ Himself. The Greek word archangel comes from archē ("chief," "ruler," or "one with authority") and angelos ("messenger"). In that sense, it can be understood as the Ruler of the angels, not necessarily someone who is an angel.
The Bible gives both Satan and Christ multiple names and titles. Satan is called Lucifer, the Devil, the Dragon, and Beelzebub. Likewise, Christ is called Jesus, Emmanuel, the Word, the Lamb of God, the Son of God, Lord, and more. So having another title such as Michael would not be unusual.
I lean toward the second view because Jesus said the dead will hear His voice and come forth (John 5:28–29). At the resurrection, Paul says the Lord Himself descends with the voice of the archangel (1 Thessalonians 4:16). That connection strongly suggests Michael is a title for Christ.
Enjoyed this answer?
Are Lucifer and Satan the same?
Are Lucifer and Satan the same?
The Bible connects Lucifer and Satan through their identical fall.
Isaiah 14:12 says, “How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer…” — while Jesus says in Luke 10:18, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.”
There actually weren’t two separate angels cast out — just one. 😇
Enjoyed this answer?
What do angels look like?
What do angels look like?
There are two main views.
One takes passages like Ezekiel 1 literally, where angels are described with multiple faces, wings, and eyes.
The other sees much of Ezekiel's imagery as symbolic. When angels appear to people elsewhere in Scripture, they consistently look like ordinary men.
For example, Daniel wrote, "Behold, there stood before me as the appearance of a man... 'Gabriel, make this man to understand the vision'" (Daniel 8:15–16).
I lean toward the second view. Prophetic visions often use symbolic imagery, while historical encounters consistently describe angels as having the appearance of men.
Enjoyed this answer?
Who were the sons of God in Genesis 6—Fallen angels, or the sethites?
Who were the sons of God in Genesis 6—Fallen angels, or the sethites?
"Sons of God” can refer to good angels or good humans depending on context—but never bad ones.
Romans 8:14 says, “For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God.” Since fallen angels are not led by God’s Spirit, Genesis 6 can’t be referring to them,
which is why it best fits the godly descendants of Seth who later turned away from God.
Enjoyed this answer?
Did Satan try to say sorry after he sinned, but it was too late?
Did Satan try to say sorry after he sinned, but it was too late?
It’s a clear biblical pattern: Pharaoh, King Saul, Judas, Esau, and others all cried “sorry” not from repentance, but to escape consequences.
That trick wasn’t invented by humans; it comes from the devil himself—the father of deception and counterfeit repentance. 🙏🏼
Enjoyed this answer?
How Could Lucifer turn the angels from God?
How Could Lucifer turn the angels from God?
The strategy would be to reinterpret God's attributes as evidence of selfish motives.
For example:
God is all-powerful → "He's controlling."
God is the Most High → "He just wants to stay above everyone else."
God alone is worshiped → "He craves praise."
God has laws → "He wants to restrict your freedom."
God warns about disobedience → "He's threatening you."
Enjoyed this answer?
How did Lucifer not get caught lying in heaven?
How did Lucifer not get caught lying in heaven?
The Bible says Satan drew a third of the angels with his tail (Revelation 12:4). But Isaiah explains the symbolism: "The prophet that teacheth lies, he is the tail" (Isaiah 9:15).
What does that mean?
Satan didn't win angels by openly attacking God—that's not how false prophets work.
False prophets appear to be on God's side while subtly twisting the truth. Likewise, Satan's rebellion didn't look like rebellion. He presented himself as defending what was right, while slandering God's character and leading heaven into deception.
Enjoyed this answer?
How Could a God of love allow animals to drown in the flood?
How Could a God of love allow animals to drown in the flood?
While a gazelle drowning is certainly sad, it's actually a more merciful death than being torn apart alive by a pack of hyenas. In that sense, the flood would have spared many animals from even more painful deaths.
Enjoyed this answer?
Did the people before the flood try to break into the ark?
Did the people before the flood try to break into the ark?
The Bible says their thoughts were only evil continually (Genesis 6:5) and that the earth was filled with violence (Genesis 6:11). Does that sound like the kind of crowd that would peacefully stand there, watching the ark drift away, saying, "Well... we probably should've gotten on." Of course not. As the waters rose, they would have done everything possible to survive.
Enjoyed this answer?
Did angels marry humans and have offspring before the flood?
Did angels marry humans and have offspring before the flood?
"The sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they took wives..." (Genesis 6:2).
Some claim these "sons of God" were fallen angels. But Jesus said angels do not marry (Matthew 22:30), so that interpretation immediately runs into a problem.
The Bible also uses the phrase "sons of God" to describe God's people (Romans 8:14), not demons.
Someone might reply, "Good angels don't marry, but fallen angels do." But there's another problem: the Bible never calls demons sons of God. That title belongs to those who are aligned with God.
The simplest reading is that the "sons of God" were the godly descendants of Seth, who had preserved the knowledge of God, but eventually compromised by marrying the unbelieving descendants of Cain. That fits both the immediate context and the rest of Scripture.
Enjoyed this answer?
How tall were the giants before the flood?
How tall were the giants before the flood?
The giants couldn't have been hundreds of feet tall.
Genesis says the floodwaters rose 15 cubits above the highest mountains (Genesis 7:20). That describes how high the water covered the mountaintops so no one could simply climb to the highest peak and survive.
If someone were taller than about 15 cubits (roughly 22 feet), the wording would seem strange. This suggests the giants were likely much shorter—perhaps somewhere around 12–15 feet tall rather than the enormous sizes sometimes claimed.
Enjoyed this answer?
Did Cain Receive a literal mark? or was it symbolic?
Did Cain Receive a literal mark? or was it symbolic?
Was Cain's mark literal?
I think it most likely was. The Bible says God put a mark on Cain so that anyone who saw him would not kill him (Genesis 4:15). That naturally suggests it was something visible.
A simple principle for reading Scripture is to take the text literally unless the context clearly indicates a symbol. Since Genesis gives no indication that Cain's mark is symbolic, I lean toward it being a literal, visible mark.
Enjoyed this answer?
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse